Blog
What Is Order 865 In Forklift Battery Shipment?
Order 865 is a U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulation mandating strict protocols for shipping lithium-powered forklift batteries by air or ground. It enforces hazard communication, spill-proof packaging, and state-of-charge limits (≤30% for air transport) to mitigate fire risks. Exemptions apply for batteries under 100Wh, but most industrial forklift packs (48V–96V, 200–800Ah) require UN38.3 testing, Class 9 labels, and Shipper’s Declaration documentation.
24V Lithium Forklift Battery Category
How does Order 865 classify forklift batteries?
Order 865 categorizes lithium forklift batteries as Class 9 hazardous materials due to thermal runaway risks. Batteries exceeding 100Wh cells or 30kg gross weight require UN-certified packaging, while those shipped at >30% SOC need airway embargoes. Pro Tip: Use LiFePO4 chemistries—they’re exempt from certain testing under DOT’s 173.185(a)(3) if cell energy stays below 1.5g equivalent lithium content.
Technically, Order 865 hinges on two thresholds: watt-hour (Wh) per cell (≤20Wh for full exemptions) and aggregate lithium content per package (≤1kg). For example, a 48V 400Ah LiFePO4 battery with 3.2V cells (12.8Wh each) avoids UN testing if cells meet ELC limits. However, non-compliant packaging—like unsecured terminals—still triggers violations. Transitionally, while the rules seem daunting, pre-shipment checklists streamline compliance: verify SOC, secure terminals with non-conductive caps, and double-label with Class 9 and UN numbers. Think of it as air travel for hazardous cargo—missing one document grounds the shipment.
What exemptions apply under Order 865?
Smaller lithium cells (≤20Wh) and batteries (≤100Wh) bypass UN testing if properly sealed. LiFePO4 packs with ≤1.5g lithium per cell also qualify for simplified packaging. Ground shipments below 30% SOC avoid airway restrictions but still need hazard labels.
Beyond capacity exemptions, Order 865 permits “Section II” shipments for batteries meeting specific criteria: cells ≤20Wh, batteries ≤100Wh, and total lithium ≤2kg/package. For instance, a 24V 30Ah LiFePO4 pack (720Wh) with 8 cells (30Ah×3.2V=96Wh/cell) would require full compliance, whereas a 12V 50Ah pack (600Wh) with cells under 20Wh might qualify. Pro Tip: Use modular designs—smaller battery banks split shipments into exempt quantities. Practically speaking, exemptions resemble checked baggage allowances: staying under weight limits avoids fees, but exceeding them demands rigorous checks.
| Exemption Type | Requirement | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Small Cells (DOT 173.185a) | ≤20Wh/cell, ≤1kg Li/content | No UN testing |
| Ground Transport | ≤30% SOC, secure packaging | No airway embargo |
What documentation is required?
Order 865 mandates a Shipper’s Declaration for Dangerous Goods, UN38.3 test summary, and Class 9 hazard labels. Air shipments add an emergency contact sheet and NOTOC (Notification to Captain) for pilots.
Technically, the Shipper’s Declaration must include UN number (e.g., UN3480 for lithium-ion), proper shipping name (“Lithium Ion Batteries”), and packing group (II). For example, shipping a 72V 200Ah forklift battery internationally requires the UN38.3 report confirming it passed altitude, thermal, and crush tests. Transitionally, while paperwork seems tedious, digital platforms like Labelmaster’s DGIS automate 80% of entries. Pro Tip: Attach test summaries externally—carriers won’t open packages to verify compliance. It’s akin to medical prescriptions: documentation proves legitimacy, but mishandling voids protection.
How do penalties for non-compliance work?
DOT fines start at $1,000 per violation daily, escalating to $78,376 for reckless endangerment. Non-compliant shipments face seizure, recalls, or blacklisting by carriers like FedEx Freight.
Beyond fines, violations trigger CSA scores (Compliance Safety Accountability), increasing audit frequency. For example, a forklift distributor shipping a 96V 500Ah battery without SOC limits could face $15k daily fines until rectified. Transitionally, carriers employ AI-driven cargo scans—undeclared lithium cells trigger automated alerts. Pro Tip: Train staff using FAA’s SafeCargo modules—certified shippers cut violation risks by 65%. Consider it like speeding tickets: one offense raises premiums, but repeated offenses revoke licenses.
| Violation Type | Fine Range | Additional Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Incorrect Labeling | $1,000–$5,000 | Shipment delay |
| Missing UN38.3 | $7,500–$78,376 | Carrier suspension |
How does Order 865 compare globally?
Order 865 aligns with IATA’s DGR Section II but diverges from Europe’s ADR 5.3.2.3.5.2, requiring CE marks and EU-type examination certificates. China’s GB 21966 imposes stricter SOC limits (≤50% for sea freight) and mandatory traceability QR codes.
Practically, multinational shippers must juggle multiple standards. For instance, a 36V 150Ah battery sent from the U.S. to Germany needs DOT’s UN38.3, IATA’s DGR labels, and ADR’s Tremcard. But what if a container shifts transport modes mid-route? Pro Tip: Use DG-compliant pallets with multi-region labels—combine Class 9, ADR’s hazard diamond, and ISO 7000 pictograms. Imagine passport stamps: each regulation grants passage, but missing one halts the journey.
Redway Battery Expert Insight
FAQs
No—it specifically regulates lithium-based chemistries. Lead-acid batteries follow 49 CFR 173.159 for corrosive materials instead.
Can I ship a partially charged lithium forklift battery via air?
Only if SOC is ≤30% and packaged per IATA PI 965 Section II. Exceeding 30% SOC requires cargo-only flights with pilot notifications.
What’s the penalty for incorrect hazard labels?
First offenses average $3,250 per shipment, plus carrier fees for relabeling. Repeat violations escalate to $12,000+ under FMCSA’s hazmat review.


